How Livy Saved Rome from the Polybian Cycle Polybius presumes that every single existing thing are liable to rot is a suggestion which hardly requires verification, since the relentless course of nature is adequate to force it on us (The Rise of the Roman Empire, VI. 57). He accepts that a steady progression of constitutions advances political solidness in the Roman state. In spite of Polybius' hypothesis, Livy's record of the sources of government and republic exhibits that a country's political changes are genuinely unusual. In The Rise of Rome, Livy shows that political upsets adjust the social and good practices of the res publica. His praiseworthy stories don't bolster Polybius' conviction that political changes are ordained. Instead of concentrating on the common and continuous progression of government, Livy deifies explicit chronicled occasions to underscore the significance of virtues. Before we inspect the contrasts among Livy and Polybius, we ought to perceive their regular grounds recorded as a hard copy the historical backdrop of Rome.
